iPhone 6 supplier NXP ramps up intimidation and delaying tactics

The Dutch multinational, which is reportedly supplying technology for Apple’s new iPhone 6, sacked 24 trade union leaders from the Metal Workers Alliance of the Philippines (MWAP) on 5 May for not working on a series of public holidays.

Now the company is said to have conveyed through the ministry of labour that it wants to try and pay off the illegally sacked workers, effectively removing the trade union leadership from the plant. MWAP has rejected this offer.

Despite assurances, NXP has failed to bring a new negotiating team to the table for talks with IndustriALL Global Union affiliate, MWAP, this week, delaying a critical conciliation meeting. In the meantime, the 24 fired trade unionists face yet another week without work and without pay

NXP has also increased the number of security guards at its plant in Cabuyao, outside the Philippine capital Manila, adding to the intimidation already felt by workers there.

Jyrki Raina, IndustriALL’s general secretary, said:

“NXP must end the delaying tactics, stop the intimidation and bring back the workers now. NXP’s cynical strategy to draw out proceedings and break the resolve of 24 loyal workers and trade union leaders, some of whom have been with the company for 20 years, is an overtly aggressive case of union busting, contravening all international standards on labour legislation.”

Furthermore, Raina added:

“NXP’s insulting attempt to pay off the illegally fired workers would set a dangerous precedent of trading corporate cash for worker rights. You cannot put a price on fundamental worker rights.”

MWAP has succeeded against all odds in achieving union representation at NXP’s Cabuyao facility in the country, which is located in a special economic zone notorious for hostility towards unions.

When MWAP workers attempted to negotiate a new collective bargaining agreement with NXP, the company responded by firing all 24 members of the union’s leadership under the pretext that their failure to work on a number of public holidays mounted to an illegal strike.

There is a growing global campaign in support of the sacked Filipino workers. As well as protests around the world, 15 IndustriALL affiliates in the Philippines have signed a powerful statement of solidarity in support of MWAP.

NXP has operations in over 25 countries. Formerly a Philips division, in 2013 NXP reported revenue of US$ 4.82 billion. As well as being key supplier to Apple, its customers include major employers of IndustriALL members including Bosch, Continental and Samsung among others.

IndustriALL Global Union represents 50 million workers in 140 countries in the mining, energy and manufacturing sectors.

For more information, please contact:

Communications Officer 
Leonie Guguen 
+41 22 308 50 23 
[email protected]

Communications Officer 
Tom Grinter 
+41796934499 
[email protected] 

Yazaki plant closure in Bahia, Brazil will make 1,200 workers redundant

Union leaders met Bahia Institutional Relations Department (SERIN) officials on 26 June to ask the state government to mediate. Head personnel officer, Martiniano Costa, agreed to explore the possibility of saving the jobs and to open talks with representatives of the company, the workers and the departments of trade and industry (SICM) and labour and employment (SETRE).

Representatives of the union and the company met the Bahian Regional Superintendent of the Ministry of Labour and Employment on 30 June in Salvador.

Fabio Dias, union president, said that the company wants to close the factory at the end of July. The company says it will not change its plans and wants to dismiss 400 workers at the end of this week so the union has strengthened the campaign against the plant closure.

The CNM/CUT Secretary for Union Policy, Loricardo de Oliveira, also attended the meeting on 30 June and said it was necessary to seek support from local and international organisations. "We are going to talk to the CUT-Sergipe, where the company plans to relocate and ask IndustriALL Global Union to raise the issue with the company’s head office in Japan. We are talking about the fate of 1,200 families. This could also have a major impact on the local economy", he said.

Paulo Cayres, CNM/CUT president said: “The metalworkers in Feira de Santana can count on the CNM/CUT’s support in this fight. We cannot leave 1,200 workers without support. It is a blow to the economy and the labour market. We are in solidarity with the metalworkers at Yazaki and with the struggle of the Feira de Santana union and we are going to fight alongside them to get Yazaki to take responsibility for the situation and ensure the plant does not close", said Cayres.

IndustriALL Global Union is following the situation closely and is ready to act in solidarity with the local union to defend the jobs of more than 1,000 workers in the auto industry.

Mexico and Colombia on IndustriALL’s critical list for severe worker violations

The Executive Committee reviewed progress in Mexico and Colombia when it met in Geneva last month. In both countries, IndustriALL’s project activities and solidarity actions are supporting unions working in very difficult circumstances.

In Mexico, independent unions are prevented from organizing and gaining bargaining rights because of the near universal use of sham ‘protection contracts’.

A number of activities aimed at helping independent unions in Mexico to organize and gain bargaining rights are underway with the support of IndustriALL’s North American affiliates the Steelworkers, UNIFOR, UAW and UE.  Some recent successes by Los Mineros are helping to give workers confidence in standing up for their right to form or join the union of their choice. 

In addition, international pressure on the government to ensure respect for freedom of association continues, as do the efforts of independent unions to seek justice in the courts, with a number of recent successes in this area.

In Colombia, where more trade unionists are killed every year than in the rest of the world combined, unions face constant persecution in a climate of total impunity.

IndustriALL’s union-building project in Colombia, supported by LO-TCO, has been instrumental in building unity; three affiliates are now on the verge of coming together in a strong mining and energy union, CUSME. 

The regional Latin American conference held in Bogota in May provided an opportunity to show support to IndustriAll affiliates. The week’s activities included a demonstration by 200 delegates in front of Ecopetrol in solidarity for oil workers union USO; a visit to a jailed USO leader; as well as a meeting with the country’s Vice President.

Negotiating Security

First they outsourced the janitorial and catering work and we didn’t speak out because we weren’t representing cleaning workers.

Then they outsourced the security jobs, and we didn’t speak out because we weren’t representing the security services.

Then they outsourced the transport and maintenance services, and we didn’t speak out because we weren’t representing workers in transportation and maintenance.

Then they outsourced our work, and there was no one left to speak for us.

Contents

 

1.  Foreword

2.  The global spread of precarious work a corporate attack on collective bargaining

3.  Overcoming the obstacles to collective bargaining trade union strategies

4.  Bargaining outcomes 

5.  The struggle continues

Foreword

The continuing expansion of precarious work is one of the biggest threats that unions face, not only to workers’ job security, pay and working conditions but to their capacity to organize workers to fight collectively for their rights. For IndustriALL, the fight against precarious work is a key strategic goal, which is integrated into all its work at global, industrial and regional level.

Each year on October 7, the World Day for Decent Work, IndustriALL affiliates mobilize globally in a show of strength against the forces that are promoting precarious work as a means of weakening worker power.

IndustriALL supports its affiliates in their struggles to limit precarious work through legislation and collective bargaining. We also act globally to pressure the institutions of global governance to amend policies which encourage precarious work. In particular, the ILO must do more to ensure that precarious workers’ fundamental rights to join a trade union and bargain collectively are protected.

Precarious workers who are employed through third party agencies and labour contractors are routinely denied these rights because of the triangular employment relationship that is created. IndustriALL has previously exposed how this particular form of precarious work undermines worker rights in its publication ‘The Triangular Trap: unions take action against agency labour’.

Collective bargaining plays a crucial role in limiting precarious work and improving conditions for precarious workers and IndustriALL affiliates have amassed a wealth of experience in using collective bargaining strategies to confront precarious work and fight back against its expansion. The examples you will find in this publication are only a sample of the many, many creative and progressive agreements unions are pursuing to protect workers. More examples can be found on our website and new ones are being added all the time.

We hope that through these examples, unions will be inspired by the work of others and will find ways to adapt the strategies outlined here to their own national circumstances.

Don’t hesitate to contact us if you want more information on a particular strategy or want to get in touch directly with the union involved.

Together we can STOP Precarious Work

 

Jyrki Raina

General Secretary

 

The global spread of precarious work

A corporate attack on collective bargaining

Every day, more and more workers all over the world are forced into precarious employment. The figures are appalling. Secure employment with good pay and conditions is under attack all over the globe.

Global economic integration and changes in production, business organization and technology are undermining permanent full-time jobs with good social benefits and protection against dismissal.

As demands for flexible labour markets increase, companies are resorting to outsourcing and subcontracting, with precarious work exploding far beyond any legitimate needs. The global economic crisis of 2008 further accelerated this decline of secure employment.

Besides insecurity, precarious workers experience lower wages, limited training opportunities; lower occupational safety and health protection; fluctuations in hours of work and/or volume of work; lower social security and social protection coverage; limited mobility toward better-quality jobs or positions; low or no trade union representation or collective bargaining coverage; and low or no labour law coverage or enforcement.

Collective Bargaining and Precarious Work

Collective bargaining is one of the most important tools trade unions have for regulating precarious work and the working conditions of precarious workers. But the explosion of precarious work itself substantially threatens workers’ collective bargaining rights.

Precarious work is often deliberately used as a way to undermine union organizing and collective bargaining as trade unions universally face difficulties to organize and represent precarious workers, whose association with a single workplace may be weak and short. Due to the insecure nature of their employment, precarious workers are often afraid to join or form a trade union.

In several countries, agency and outsourced jobs are reclassified in a way that legally prevents these workers from being eligible for membership in the union where they work. Unions are as such prevented by law from representing and bargaining for outsourced or agency workers in their industrial sector or enterprise.

For workers in triangular employment relationships, bargaining is nigh on impossible. The user company where they work controls their working conditions, yet the agency or sub-contractor is their legally recognized employer, even though it has no actual control over their work.

Temporary agencies contracted by companies are often illegal actors, with which it is difficult to bargain.

In Niger, according to a study carried out in 2010, sixty private firms and employment agencies existed, while only around twenty were legally operating and recognized.

Sub-contracting and outsourcing:
how companies escape their responsibilities

 

Oil Industry in Nigeria:

In Nigeria, multinationals and oil service companies outsource a very large proportion of their workforce to unlicensed labour contractors, notwithstanding that the jobs are continuous, routine and permanent in nature. The user companies supervise the workers and determine their salaries. They only transfer payments to the labour contractors. 

Shipbuilding in Germany:

Companies tend to hand over their responsibilities and do not bother monitoring what their subcontractors are getting up to. Moreover, the subcontractor they have signed the agreement with will then pass the work on to sub-sub-subcontractors. In the end, companies no longer have the slightest idea of who is working on their premises. […] The subcontractors make a tidy profit for themselves at the expense of the workers

            – Meinhard Geiken in charge of IG Metall’s Coastal District

Mining in Madagascar:

In July 2013, QMM (Qit Madagascar Minerals- Rio Tinto) ended its contract with the security company OMEGA Risk Solutions in favour of two cheaper companies. This resulted in the collective dismissal of 300 workers, terminated with only one month’s notice. IndustriALL affiliate FISEMA tried to negotiate severance benefits with QMM Rio Tinto but the company refused to take responsibility for the workers, on the basis that it was not the employer.

 

Collective bargaining has an important role to play in limiting the expansion of precarious work and better protecting precarious workers. But these are uphill battles.

Overcoming the obstacles to collective bargaining

trade union strategies

Bargaining arrangements used by unions vary from country to country, within a country or an industrial sector. Several factors influence the way bargaining is conducted, including the national legal framework, existing models of collective bargaining, union strength and bargaining power and the prevalence of precarious work in the country or sector.

Organizing and representing precarious workers in collective bargaining

 

Union strength is dependent on membership. We have to organize contract workers, unionize them, fight for them and increase our strength

            – B.K. Das, General Secretary INMF

IndustriALL encourages its affiliates to organize and represent precarious workers, and bargain on their behalf, rather than pushing for the creation of separate unions for them. Outsourcing generates a real risk of fragmentation of the bargaining power of trade unions, with single companies contracting multiple numbers of subcontracting firms or temporary agencies. In the world’s largest open-pit set of coal mines, Carbones del Cerrejón in Colombia, out of 11’900 workers, 6’500 are outsourced and employed by more than 300 different subcontractors.

Organizing precarious workers in an existing union better protects precarious workers and builds stronger unions, in turn protecting permanent workers by preventing division of the workforce into separate, isolated bargaining units. Once the union can show that it is able to bargain collectively on behalf of precarious workers, precariously employed workers will be more likely to join the union when they see that it can do something for them.

If needed, unions can change their rules and statutes to remove barriers to precarious workers joining.

In Germany, the major unions established specific bargaining associations for temporary agency workers in order to recruit these workers and to enforce equal treatment arrangements in collective agreements.

Through a strong focus on improving conditions for agency workers, in 2012 IG-Metall gained 38’000 new members among temporary staff.

Indonesian unions FSPMI and Lomenik have successfully organized contract and outsourced employees on Batam, an island that is itself an export processing zone (EPZ). According to FSPMI, around 98% of all workers in the Batam EPZ are hired through labour agencies, the majority of whom are women.

In addressing the needs of EPZ workers, FSPMI and Lomenik devised strategies to change the status of contract workers to permanent, negotiating collective agreements that decrease the number of contract workers.

Throughout its campaign to organize outsourced workers in Indian coal mines, the INMF has also followed the principle of organizing contract workers into the same unions rather than dividing the workforce through the creation of separate unions.

However, necessary amendments to union statutes were taking too long in a few cases, so the unions supported the creation of a number of separate unions for contract workers, including the Mahanadi Coal Fields Contractual Transport Workers Union (10’000 members). Collective bargaining with the transport employers’ association has resulted in regular payment of wages through the bank, deduction of provident fund contributions, access to medical facilities in the company hospitals and annual bonuses.

Several factors contributed to the success of this strategy: the continued support of the federation INMF to the precarious workers’ trade union; parallel negotiations by the INMF with the user company and, above all, the solidarity of permanent workers who supported the precarious workers’ strike.

Sectoral bargaining

Sectoral bargaining takes place nationally or at the regional and/or municipal level. Coverage of sector agreements is often high as a result of the number and size of the companies bound by agreements. Extension requirements under the law may further extend the reach of the agreement. If agreements cover “all workers” or all persons “engaged in an industry”, as opposed to “employees”, coverage can be expanded to include workers in precarious employment relationships.

Bargaining at industrial sector level can play an important role in regulating the use of precarious work, notably outsourcing and temporary agency work, as well as the working conditions of precarious workers. Fragmentation is to be avoided, especially where subcontractors supply labour to more than one company.

In Denmark, in the industrial production and construction sectors, unions have negotiated sectoral agreements, which include protocols on agency work. These protocols state that agency workers must be employed in accordance with the sector-specific agreement, covering all aspects of pay, working time and other important terms and conditions of employment. In Belgium, the Commissions Paritaires (Joint Committees), comprising workers’ and employers’ organizations, have included restrictions on the use of agency workers in collective agreements. A specific commission was established to regulate temporary agency labour through agreements applicable for different industrial sectors. These agreements protect workers’ rights to pensions, health and safety and training. IG-Metall in Germany reached an agreement in 2012 with the metal and electrical industries’ employers for the right of works councils to object to the use of agency labour.

In Argentina, the oil and gas federation FASPyGP succeeded in negotiating a clause in the gas industry collective agreement, which stipulates that all provisions of the agreement apply equally to subcontracting firms.

> Art 2: Exclusivity

[…] b) Subcontractors: Companies with activities under this collective agreement shall be jointly liable for the obligations going on between subcontractors and their employees and enshrined in the Labour standards and Social Security […] Companies and FASPyGP use all means available to enforce the provisions of this collective agreement and legislation.

FASPyGP- Collective Bargaining agreement for gas sectors (2010-2013)

In South Africa, NUMSA has reached several agreements in different sectors (automobile, tyre, metal) that aim at phasing out labour brokers and improving the working conditions of precarious workers.

Enterprise bargaining

Collective bargaining at enterprise/plant level is more likely to exclude precarious workers, such as agency and outsourced workers, as they are not direct employees of the user company. Union strength and bargaining power at enterprise, and even more so at plant level is eroded by outsourcing. But many unions are left with no choice other than to bargain at the level of an individual company when they are restricted by the industrial relations system. Where sectoral bargaining is not possible, bargaining directly with the user enterprise on behalf of both permanent and outsourced/agency workers is the best way to consolidate union strength and fight for equal conditions.

Despite the limitations, some affiliates have been able to mobilize and negotiate effective collective agreements. In 2012, in Canada, after a six month lockout at Rio Tinto in Alma, the United Steel Workers (USW) succeeded in negotiating a collective agreement limiting the use of outsourced workers to 10% of the worked hours. In the USA, USW also concluded an agreement with the tyre company Bridgestone that restricted the use of outsourced workers for maintenance. This clause has enabled the USW to maintain at 5% the rate of outsourced workers in Bridgestone operations. Bridgestone must also consult workplace union representatives on the necessity for, and scope of outsourcing.

Negotiating with agencies and contractors

Trade unions have also negotiated agreements with the temporary work agencies or subcontracting firms that are recognized as the legal employers.

There are clear limitations to what can be achieved for workers by bargaining with labour contractors rather than user companies. A large company may use many small and medium-sized contractors, fracturing bargaining units and requiring multiple negotiations. Contractors may also have limited control over the working conditions that are the subject of negotiations.

In Nigeria, the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) admitted to IndustriALL affiliate NUPENG that it has over 30’000 precarious workers in its system. NUPENG is demanding oil multinationals to facilitate the establishment of a Contractors Forum as an umbrella body for the contractors to negotiate with the union on behalf of the contract workers.

The union also calls for a negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement for all the contract workers in Shell operations. While contractors’ forums have already been formed at Chevron, Total and Agip to negotiate with the union on conditions of service for their contract staff, the management of Shell and Mobil have so far refused to do the same.

In the Chevron-Uni Thai plant that assembles offshore oil and gas platforms in Laem Chabang, Thailand, two groups of agency workers supplied by two different agencies managed to reach agreement with both agencies: The workers had never before been covered by a collective agreement and the new CBA brought them rights and benefits for the first time.

> 1.) Annual leave:

> 3.) 13th month salary: 30% of the worker’s monthly salary will be paid out in December

2013 agreement between CUEL Subcontract Workers Union and Megatech Industrial Consultant (Thailand)

A better alternative to negotiating with individual agencies or contractors is to conclude sectoral agreements covering the entire temporary staffing industry in a particular sector.

In Europe, in several countries including the Netherlands, Sweden, Belgium, Spain, Switzerland and France, unions have concluded national agreements that cover temporary agency staff in all industrial sectors. The agreements regulate working conditions and cover a large proportion, if not all, of the temporary agency workforce. In some countries, different agreements are struck for blue-collar and white-collar workers (e.g. Denmark, Sweden, Austria).

In Germany, IG Metall has concluded sector-specific collective labour agreements with two of the most important temporary work organizations (BAP and iGZ). These agreements, which have been concluded in the metal, electrical, textile and clothing sectors, as well as by IGBCE in the chemical, plastic and rubber sectors, provide additional sector-specific bonuses for agency temporary staff that will gradually equalize wage differences between agency workers and permanent staff.

While negotiating with agencies at national or sectoral level has delivered some important outcomes for agency workers, this has largely been restricted to unions in Western Europe. Such agreements are only possible where there is significant union strength among agency workers, where collective bargaining is well protected by the law and is well institutionalized. It cannot be a model for most agency work situations in the world. Furthermore, it is not possible for agreements with agencies to set limits on the use of agency workers, which is why successful agreements with agencies are made in conjunction with industry agreements. In the example above, the German unions negotiated agreements with user companies in each sector at the same time as they were negotiating with temporary work agencies.

Global bargaining

Global Framework Agreements (GFAs) provide an opportunity to set agreed limits on precarious employment through global level negotiations with companies, covering what is a necessary level of temporary employment for the particular demands faced. Language reflecting the commitment of an MNC to reduce precarious employment throughout its global operations and those of its suppliers can be very useful. It can be used to address situations where temporary, agency, outsourced or other forms of precarious employment have replaced permanent employment, as well as to support reinstatement of permanent, direct employment and (re)establish unionization. The GFA between IndustriALL and GDF Suez holds great potential for limiting precarious work:

[the company] recognizes the importance of secure employment for both the individual and for society through a preference for permanent, open-ended and direct employment. GDF SUEZ and all sub-contractors shall take full responsibility for all work being performed under the appropriate legal framework and, in particular, shall not seek to avoid obligations of the employer to dependent workers by disguising what would otherwise be an employment relationship or through the excessive use of temporary or agency labour.

 

IndustriALL Global Union’s global framework agreement (GFA) with Spanish-based Inditex, the world’s largest garment retailer, aims to ensure the sustainable and long-term observance of international labour standards throughout the Inditex supply chain. Inditex uses 1’300 suppliers, and 5’000 ‘manufacturers’ in 40 countries, employing around 700’000 workers. The GFA is the first of its kind to cover a retail supply chain and it provides workers with mechanisms to monitor and enforce their rights at work. In 2012, the agreement was reinforced through an addendum defining union involvement in implementation and monitoring.

The addendum guarantees IndustriALL and its affiliated unions access to all Inditex information on its suppliers.

The terms of the agreement apply equally to direct suppliers, contractors and subcontractors, including homeworkers. Inditex forbids all subcontracting without its prior written consent and suppliers allowed to subcontract are held responsible for subcontractor compliance.

The GFA has enabled several labour conflicts with suppliers to be settled in Peru, Cambodia, India, Turkey, Brazil and Portugal. Workers fired because of their involvement in trade unions have been reinstated and trade unions have been recognized as formal interlocutors.

Activities to enforce the GFA have included:

Despite the involvement of Inditex management, the task is not easy due to the fragmentation of production and the high number of subcontractors, who themselves subcontract production.

Key success factors

In South Africa, NUMSA was able to conclude its agreement with the automobile industry sector only after a very strong mobilisation – 4 months of negotiations and a 2 week nationwide strike.

In Germany, in the weeks before concluding the agreements on precarious work, 800,000 IG Metall members took part in powerful warning strikes in all collective bargaining regions.

In India, OCMS negotiated wage increases for drivers, mechanics and helpers after a 3-day strike that paralysed the transportation of coal in the Talcher coalfields.

Trade unions must be able to mobilize not only precarious workers but also permanent workers to put maximum pressure on employers. This is easier when precarious and permanent workers are organized in the same union. The solidarity of permanent workers can prove crucial. In Argentina, when SUTNA, the tyre trade union, was organizing precarious workers and bargaining for their regularisation, permanent workers agreed to use collective bargaining to settle the outsourcing issue rather than pursuing improvements to conditions for themselves.

Similarly, in Guinea mining affiliate CNTG succeeded in convincing permanent workers to agree to forego wage increases in order to negotiate for the regularisation of precarious workers.

The USW in Canada was able to mobilize national and international solidarity in support of workers at Rio Tinto Alcan in Alma, Quebec, who refused management efforts for retiring employees to be replaced by non-union contract workers earning half the wages with no pensions or benefits. USW representatives travelled the globe to build support for the Alma workers and develop a dynamic international campaign. On March 31 2012, 8,000 union members from Canada, the U.S., Europe, Africa and Australia attended a rally in Alma. Under the resulting agreement, contracting out is strictly managed and limited.

The key to victory was the enormous solidarity shown by our members in Quebec who inspired trade unions across the globe to support them

            – Daniel Roy, USW Quebec Director

 

Bargaining Outcomes

Limiting precarious work

Central to the IndustriALL campaign ‘STOP Precarious Work’ is the call to affiliates to conclude agreements that keep employment direct and permanent. Such agreements discourage the use of outsourcing and encourage regular employment, prevent the replacement of regular employees with temporary or short-term employees, and ensure that these work arrangements are only used to meet legitimate needs.

Setting limits on precarious work is crucial, since the more precarious work takes over, the smaller and weaker the bargaining unit becomes, making such agreements impossible in the future.

Prohibiting precarious work in certain industrial sectors or occupations

Some unions, including NUMSA in South Africa, are succeeding in concluding agreements that forbid or phase out the use of labour brokers in entire sectors.

> Article 5. Labour brokers

The parties agree that the use of Labour brokers will be discontinued with effect from 1 January 2011 in respect of the bargaining unit, with the sole exception of the pre-existing labour brokers contracts which will be allowed to run their course.

Consolidated Heads of Agreement between AMEO and NUMSA

Where blanket bans have not been achievable, agreements put barriers by prohibiting the use of temporary workers, particularly outsourced or agency workers, in certain occupations:

> The Company agrees that, daily tasks dealing with maintenance directly affecting the production, and currently performed by its own and directly hired staff, will only be performed by its own staff, and that, in the tyre storage and dispatch the company will not use workers hired through a sub-contracting company.

SUTNA, Argentina, Collective Bargaining for the Tyre Industry, Annex 1- Bridgestone

 

> Clause 46

In carrying out of the services linked to its main productive activities, the COMPANY can only use workers hired by it.

Collective bargaining agreement 2010-2012, between Bridgestone Brazil and the Rubber, Tyre and Related Industries Workers Union of the Sao Paulo Region

Consultation on use of precarious work

Other agreements stipulate that unions will be consulted prior to changes that could affect the employment status of employees, and include tools and rights to monitor outsourcing processes.

Clauses stipulate that unions must be provided with all relevant facts related to the use of precarious workers: reasons for using precarious workers; details of the planned restructuring; number of people outsourced; full comparison of costs between using directly employed workers with the cost of working with subcontracted or agency labour. This gives unions an opportunity to question the company on the effectiveness and the legitimacy of the outsourcing.

In Canada, the agreement that settled the dispute at Rio Tinto Alma establishes a committee on outsourcing, comprising equal numbers of union and management representatives, that examines and makes recommendations on outsourcing proposals.

>2.2 SECURITY OF EMPLOYMENT

[…] The intent of the parties is to minimise the use of supplementary labour hire personnel. The parties recognise that from time to time there will be a requirement for supplementary labour hire employment. When the need arises for larger volumes of labour hire personnel the Company will consult with the consultative committee / senior shop steward:

Futuris Automotive Interiors Parts and Accessories (South Australia) Workplace Agreement 2011

Limiting the number of precarious workers and the length of assignments

In Brazil, tyre union Sindicato da Borracha da São Paulo signed agreements with tyre companies (Bridgestone, Pirelli, Goodyear) operating in their region which regulate the working conditions of direct fixed term workers. The agreements stipulate that temporary workers should not represent more than 5% of the workforce involved in production. In Canada, Rio Tinto Alma workers achieved cap of 10-15% on the total hours worked by outsourced workers.

Prevailing conditions do not always allow such low proportions to be negotiated immediately. In Thailand, the Thai Electronic, Electrical Appliances, Auto and Metal Workers’ Union (TEAM) has been able to set limits on outsourcing and use of agency labour of between 30% and 50%. This is a first step towards limiting the expansion of precarious work in sectors and countries where it is threatening to overtake permanent work.

A number of agreements provide for a maximum duration of temporary worker assignments and a maximum number of contract extensions. In 2011, NUMSA agreed with the Steel and Engineering Federation of South Africa, the main metal employer’s federation, that workers cannot be employed through labour brokers for longer than 4 months. After that, a worker must become permanent, if retained.

> 2 º) The worker, even if the contractual arrangement allowed it legally, cannot remain under a temporary contract over two years, so this time limit reached will acquire the status of permanent members of staff.

Collective Bargaining Bridgestone España and Spanish Trade Unions

 

> 4.5.1 Fixed Term Employment (Non-Trade employees)

[…] Fixed term employees shall be engaged for as long as the particular requirement exists but for not more than 12 months, inclusive of an initial three month probationary period. Except if a fixed term non trades employee is extended in accordance with this clause, after 12 months of continuous employment or after employment for a cumulative period of 12 months provided that the break in employment is no longer than three months, a fixed term non trades employee will be converted to permanent.

Holden (Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2011

 

> Article II – B

Probationary and Temporary or Casual Employment

Section 1.

b) A ‘temporary or casual employee’ is any person hired to perform a specific and/or temporary job not connected with the regular operation, covering a very limited duration of time. However, any temporary or casual employee performing the job of a regular employee and has worked for 156 days in any 12 months period shall be deemed a regular employee.

Indo Phil Textile Mills, INC. (Bulacan-Philippines) Collective Bargaining Agreement, 2010-2015

Unions have also negotiated for shorter probation periods that are often used by employers as a form of precarious work. At a Bridgestone plant in Thailand, direct fixed-term ‘Project workers’ are ‘assistants’ to permanent workers in the production line. The union achieved an agreement under which these project workers become permanent after nine months instead of two years.

Preference for permanent work and rules for the use of precarious work

Statements in agreements on preference for permanent and direct employment can be a useful tool for preventing the use of precarious work beyond the legitimate needs of a company. The AMWU has negotiated a number of such clauses in Australia:

> 11.1 The parties to the Agreement recognise the benefit of a stable workforce and commit to implement employment practices to support this.

11.2 It is not the intention of the Company to utilise the services of contractors or subcontractors to the detriment of the employment security of direct Employees.

Als Industrial Division (Victoria) AMWU Enterprise Agreement 2012

 

> 21.2 If Griffin does engage contractors, Griffin will not retrench, make redundant or otherwise terminate the employment of any employee covered by this Agreement in order to replace that position with a contractor or an employee of a contractor or labour hire company.

Griffin Coal (Maintenance) Collective Agreement 2012

Many unions have been able to define in agreements the limited circumstances and reasons for reverting to temporary labour.

> Section 10:

[…] The company will perform regular continuing maintenance work with employees of its mechanical departments except when lack of skills or  equipment, nature of the work of time considerations make it impractical.

Installation work, fabrication work, machine shop work or repair work on existing equipment may be performed for a plant by its mechanical departments, depending upon the availability of skills, time considerations, nature of the work, reasonably competitive cost, performance guarantees, installation cost included in purchase price, as well as whether the work can be handled by offering the appropriate mechanical department employees […] overtime hours […] If any of the aforementioned conditioned are not met, the company shall have the option of placing the work with an outsider company.

The company will notify the union when an outside contractor is to work within the plant. Such notification shall specify the location, type scope, duration, need for and timetable of the work to be performed.

[…] Should the union believe a discussion is necessary, it shall request for a meeting. […] At such meetings the parties will review the plans for the work to be performed and the reason for contracting out such work. The Company will give good faith consideration to any suggestions by the Union, subject to the limitations in paragraph (b) above, and to any alternate plan proposed by the union for the possible performance of the work by bargaining unit personnel.

USW master agreement with Bridgestone

 

> Art. 55. USE of CONTRACTORS

BOC may on occasions require using contractors where practical business considerations preclude the use of the permanent domestic labour force in whole or in part, or the employment of additional permanent or temporary staff (clause 10) is not a viable option.

Such circumstances may include:

  1. Special maintenance periods; i.e. shut downs
  2. Concentrated workload of limited duration
  3. The supply and installation of new plant or machinery
  4. Where specialized work or skills are required
  5. And other one off activities

This will not extend to normal maintenance regularly carried out by permanent staff

When such circumstances arise, BOC will:

  1. Consult with the appropriate union site delegate
  2. Not actively engage in activities to disadvantage the permanent domestic workforce
  3. Ensure that all work undertaken by contractors conforms to the safety standards as required

BOC/Linde Engineering Employees Collective Employment Agreement 2012-2014 (Signed by New Zealand EPMU)

 

> 4.3.3 Use of Casual/Temporary Employees at HSPO (Non-Salaried)

(a) In conjunction with clause 4.3.1, Holden may engage casual employees at HSPO when:

  1. more than 16% of a workgroup is on planned leave (being annual leave/RDOs/long service leave) […]
  2. on any shift where there are more than 3 or more unplanned absences Holden may engage one casual employee to replace each absent employee at or above this threshold;

Holden (Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2011

Reversing course on outsourcing

Affiliates have managed to challenge outsourcing by showing that quality reduced significantly after regular workers became irregular. In Brazil, the Union of Chemical, Pharma, Ink and Varnish workers of ABC managed to reconvert outsourced workers to permanent at Soplast when it pointed out that quality had reduced. Similarly, at Kimberly Clark-Sao Paulo, cargo handling was originally outsourced but from 2010, all the workers were again permanent and direct because of problems with the work performed.

Setting global limits in a company

In 2012, IndustriALL signed a global agreement limiting temporary work. The ground breaking ‘Temporary Work Charter for the Volkswagen Group’ sets principles for use of temporary work in the entire Volkswagen Group worldwide (Volkswagen, Audi, Seat, Skoda, Rolls-Royce Bentley, Lamborghini, Auto-Europa). In September 2013, the Volkswagen Group operated 105 production plants in 19 European countries and a further eight countries in the Americas, Asia and Africa with 570’000 employees worldwide.

The agreement states that temporary work should not exceed 5% and allows the European and global works councils, as well as the employee representatives in the different plants, to monitor the proportion of temporary agency workers.

> a) Limiting the number of temporary workers

The number of temporary external employees in the Volkswagen Group has to be in an appropriate relationship with permanent employees. As a benchmark for this, temporary external personnel make up 5% of the workforce per plant. Company and employee representation can amicably agree on a different portion at each plant. […] The Volkswagen European Group Works Council and the Volkswagen Group Global Works Council have the right to have the Group Board of Management inform them over the level of temporary external personnel at work in the company or the individual sites as well as their percentage of the total workforce. The employee representatives have the same rights at their respective level as do the Volkswagen European Group Works Council and the Volkswagen Group Global Works Council for the entire company.

c) Limiting the length of an individual’s assignment

The protection of a temporary external employee should not exceed the respective assignment length at the Volkswagen Group, a total of 3 contract extensions or a period of 36 months collectively. If the temporary external employee has reached the maximum employment limit, his or her adoption into the permanent workforce will be reviewed individually by the responsible department.

Temporary Work Charter for the Volkswagen Group

Converting precarious work to regular employment

Unions have been able to use collective bargaining to move precarious workers to direct and permanent employment.

Affiliates have launched several campaigns to regularize workers. In Guinea, after a long struggle, mining federations succeeded in 2012 in transforming 300 temporary positions into permanent ones in mining company CBK. In Senegal, SUTIDS bargained the regularization of 450 temporary workers, after negotiations with employers in six chemical and pharmaceutical companies: SATREC, SIPS, SIVOP, SPN, SYBEL and NDIAMBOURS.

In Thailand, trade unions have also concluded agreements with user companies to regularise fixed term and agency/outsourced workers.

> Fixed term (two years contract) workers who have been in service with EGAT for six years shall be converted to regular employees of EGAT. The workers shall have obtained at least a vocational school certificate equivalent to the level of senior high school.

EGAT Labour Union CBA on Precarious Work signed with the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT)

As a result of this agreement, 1’200 contract workers have been converted to regular employees of EGAT.

Moving agency workers into direct and permanent employment is not always possible. Therefore unions try to convert agency work into direct temporary work as a first step. This often already allows the agency workers to join the unions and be covered by the collective agreement. In Malaysia, trade unions in the manufacturing sector had applied to represent outsourced and agency workers, but the ministry of human resources rejected the application, arguing that the union was not competent to represent service workers. In response, the Paper Manufacturing Employees Union bargained the regularization of outsourced and temporary workers at Kimberly Clark Malaysia to direct fixed-term employment, so that these workers became entitled to the terms and conditions of the collective agreement.

Giving priority of employment to temporary workers when a vacancy occurs is another means of facilitating the regularization of precarious workers into permanent workers.

> The recruitment policy of the Company will be governed by the principle of promoting stability in employment, so it should take into account the following criteria:

1. […] if during the term of the temporary contract a vacancy occurred, the employee will have a preferential right to move to fill the vacancy compared to job seekers at the time unrelated to the company.

Collective Bargaining Bridgestone España and Spanish Trade Unions

 

> This charter is based on the principle that the temporary employment should provide the individual with the chance to be taken on in the permanent workforce, if the necessary qualifications have been gained and the appropriate opportunity exists within the company. It sets the preference to take temporary workers if there is a need to hire permanent personnel. Furthermore in this sense, the charter provides vocational training to temporary workers.

When human resources planning determine that temporary external personnel can be employed in a long term basis, they will be taken on preferentially as permanent employees according to the take on criteria agreed on between the company and the employee representation at the site. After 18 months, a take-over is considered if appropriate training, personal attributes and sustained need for personnel exist. Thus, temporary work at Volkswagen becomes an opportunity for permanent employment and, in addition to apprenticeships, trainee programmes and direct recruitment of externals, a third way of entering the company. All brands and companies ensure that temporary external employees are preferentially treated during hiring when permanent personnel are needed. They further pledge to offer their technically-related training programme to the temporary workforce, just like the permanent workforce of the respective sites.

Temporary Work Charter for the Volkswagen Group

Improving precarious workers working conditions and protecting their rights

Measures aimed at controlling and limiting the use of precarious work must be well designed so that measures intended to benefit precarious workers do not result in them becoming more insecure. In the Netherlands, FNV Bondgenoten campaigns for the adoption by employers of a ‘9 by 12’ rule: where any given job is being performed by an agency worker for 9 months out of 12, that job needs to be become permanent, and so does the worker. The union now also focuses on obtaining better wages, pension rights and training opportunities for agency workers, as they have found that putting the right to a permanent job after a shorter period into a collective labour agreement can have the opposite effect, with employers firing agency workers earlier in order to avoid such provisions.

Some unions have been able to negotiate access to information about the contracting company (its legal status, its record of labour practices, its technical expertise) and to make sure that bidders for the contract are asked, as part of their bid, to provide a statement on how they will deal with such issues as freedom of association, child labour, equality, health and safety, training, employment relationships, salary and working hours, pension rights and redundancy. This provides a good tool for trade unions to protect temporary workers rights and to check that precarious workers benefit from decent working conditions.

> Leasing manpower from manpower agencies (temporary help agencies)

1.4.2 Employees in manpower or temporary help agencies shall have the same wages and working conditions that apply in the enterprise leasing manpower for the duration of the leasing period […]

1.4.3 The lessee enterprise is obligated to disclose the necessary information to the manpower ortemporary help agency, so that the condition of equal treatment pursuant to 1.3.2 can be satisfied, and to subject the manpower or temporary help agency to this condition. At the request of the shop stewards, the enterprise shall document the wages and working conditions that apply at the manpower or temporary help agency when leased employees are to work under the scope of this agreement.

1.4.4 […] Leased employees shall be presented to the shop stewards at the lessee enterprise. When discussing the leasing of manpower, the local parties shall also discuss the resources for shop steward work […].

Industry Agreement 2012-2014, between Norwegian employer federations NHO and Norsk Industri and trade unions LO and Fellesforbundet

Equal treatment

Bargaining for equal pay and conditions between precarious and permanent workers has the dual benefit of eliminating discrimination and combatting social dumping. In many cases, affiliates have been able to bargain equal pay for equal jobs. The extension of the terms of a collective agreement in a particular sector or industry to all workers can also have a significant levelling effect.

> Contract Employees

The employer will not contract out the work except where the contract provides that any Contractor or LHC will employ and continue to employ during the term of the contract its employees (contract employees) on terms and conditions that are no less favourable than those in this agreement.

Altius Construction and Engineering AMWU On-Site Construction Collective Agreement for New South Wales 2013-2015

 

> Contractors

The Company shall consult and ensure the wages and conditions, where applicable, of contractors’ and labour hire companies’ employees engaged to do work covered by this Agreement, are no less favourable than the wages and conditions provided for in this Agreement for equivalent or similar work.

Visy Packaging Cartons AFMEPKIU/ETU  Collective Agreement 2013

 

> Short term contracts:

Having due regards for the need for flexibility, in respect of hourly labour, the parties agree that short term contract employees shall be:

  1. Paid at the entry rate of the appropriate skill level
  2. Entitled to participated in the multi-skilling programme
  3. Entitled to participation in company specific arrangements for retirement, death and disabilities benefits
  4. Entitled to participate in established company medical aid arrangements; or, if impractical, maybe given the cash equivalent to company’s medical aid contribution to fund an alternative medical aid arrangements; or if this is not possible, then a cash equivalent will be payable, and;
  5. Entitled to receive a separation allowance on termination of services […]

Heads of Agreement 2010 (consolidated in 11 September 2013) between AMEO and NUMSA

In Germany, nine collective agreements with two of the main temporary employers’ organizations (BAP and iGZ) provide a sector-based supplement to wages of temporary workers, thus closing the gap between regular and temporary agency workers. For each industry, the relevant agreement stipulates that after an initial job assignment of four to six weeks, staggered supplements are to be paid according to the length of the job assignment at a user company. After nine months, temporary agency workers earn a supplement of up to 50%, which enables them to achieve equality of pay with permanent staff.

In Mauritius, at least 15 collective agreements have been signed which include a common level playing field for contractual and permanent workers:

> Contractual Worker

No contractual worker shall be paid less than an employee employed on a permanent basis for any job of the same value.

Marine Biotechnology Products Ltd

 

> That all employees performing work of same value should be equally remunerated, even for casual and contractual workers with Contract of Employment with determinate duration.

Total (Mauritius) Ltd.

Besides basic wages, pay includes allowances, seniority and other bonuses to which precarious workers may not have access. Equal treatment goes beyond pay to include access to social benefits, holidays, working hours, health and safety and training.

> […] During their activity with Volkswagen, temporary external employees are given the same working conditions as the permanent employees in the workplace. The equal treatment of temporary external personnel includes, for example, the access to general company information as well as health and safety in the workplace, the access to collective communal facilities and services as well as social standards […].

Charter on Temporary Work for the Volkswagen Group

Before my job was outsourced, I regularly participated in training…since then I’ve had one short training course, in seven years

            – Testimony of an agency worker in manufacturing

In India, the INMF has launched a campaign to improve the conditions of precarious workers and has signed several agreements aiming at reducing the gap between permanent and precarious workers in the public mines.

> i) Where the existing rate of wages of any employee based on contract or agreement or otherwise are higher than the rates, the higher rates shall be protected and treated as the Minimum rates of wages for contactor workers.

Wage agreement for contractor workers engaged in mining operations (November 2012), between Coal India Ltd, the INMF and Others

Where equal pay provisions apply only to minimum wage rates, precarious workers may still receive lower pay in practice. Precarious workers may also be placed on lower pay rates because their precarious status means they have less experience or less seniority. Seniority is a critical issue as it is linked also to promotion and pensions. Unions have tried to address the seniority of precarious workers through collective bargaining.

> Appendix 17: Protocol – Temporary agencies

1. Any job for the temporary agency which is covered by the Industrial Agreement shall accumulate seniority in accordance with the rules described in the Industrial Agreement.[…]

[…] The seniority shall apply to all rights under this Agreement which are conditional on seniority.

Industrial Agreement 2012-2014 between COIndustri and Dansk Industri

 

> Work contracts

Art. 16. – The social partners in the chemical industry agree that if a worker, at the end of successive fixedterm contracts, is hired as a permanent direct worker for the same function, and with no interruption of more than four weeks, no new probationary period will be asked and seniority previously acquired under the fixed term contracts is maintained.

Belgium Joint Committee for Chemical Industry, Collective Bargaining Agreement 2007-08

In Belgium, many collective agreements for temporary agency work include improvements to pension benefits for agency workers in several industrial sectors, complementing the existing statutory pension system.

> Art. 2. Pursuant to Article 2 of the CBA of 3 October 2011 on the pension premium for temporary workers, temporary employment agencies undertake to pay a pension premium to agency workers made available to a user undertaking.

Collective Bargaining Agreement (10 January 2012), Pensions premium for temporary agency workers in oil industry, Belgium

Protecting health and safety of precarious workers

Studies since the 1990’s have shown that fixed-term workers, as well as outsourced and agency workers, are much more vulnerable and experience greater health and safety risks than standard, permanent and direct workers.

Sectoral or company agreements that cover all workers, including precarious workers, enable the precarious worker to benefit from the same protection as the direct and permanent employees of the user company. In Brazil, an agreement with Bayer Brazil stipulates that all rules applicable to Bayer regarding health and safety must be respected by all contractors.

Agreements that give trade unions in the user company access to the commercial contracts between the user company and the subcontracting company enable them to monitor the working conditions of outsourced and agency workers. This allows the trade unions to denounce any violations of precarious workers’ rights and to ensure a better protection of their health and safety at work.

Following the deaths of two contract workers from Romania in a fire that completely gutted the house provided by their employers, IG Metall was able to sign a collective agreement in 2013 with the German Meyer Werft shipyard that extends co-determination to contract workers. The two victims were employed as contract workers by SDS, a recruitment agency for the shipyard that provided workers with deplorable living and working conditions. The agreement stipulates that worker accommodation must comply with the relevant standards and allows the Meyer Werft works council to closely monitor the company’s subcontractors by giving them more information on contracts with sub-contractors. A ‘subcontractor agreement working group’, comprising equal numbers of management and worker representatives, was established to monitor compliance. Non-compliance is subject to penalties, including termination of the subcontractor agreement.

Collective agreements can also ensure access to health and safety training and information for precarious workers.

> Chapter 11 Occupational training

Article 49: Occupational training

1. In order to comply with the general obligation to provide to the outsourced workers necessary and appropriate training on the characteristics of the job, temporary work companies will allocate annual 1 percent of payroll to cover the training needs of workers hired to be assigned to user undertakings.

 

> Chapter 12: Occupational health and safety:

Article 50. Prevention of occupational hazards.

2. And as it refers specifically to workers made available to user undertakings, both parties [temporary agency and the user undertaking ] shall in particular ensure compliance with the provisions of the [appropriate applicable law] […]

3. In accordance with [the applicable law] […], the user company will instruct the worker made available to its disposal on the risks for their health and safety, both general risks in the company, and the specifics ones related to the job and tasks to be performed by this worker, and the corresponding prevention and protection measures and activities, especially with regard to the potential emergencies.

Fifth National Collective Bargaining Agreement for Temporary Agency Workers, Spain

Where there is a triangular employment relationship involved, collective agreements can prevent each employer from using this relationship to avoid their responsibilities.

> Art. 26 – Safety / special work / hazardous

[…] The service provider should instruct the personnel advisors and employees about safety at work and confirm it in the work contract. […]

User undertakings, according to the ordinance on the prevention of accidents, are responsible for the provision of basic safety equipment, safeguards measures and additional instructions, appropriate protective clothing, compliance with the requirements for protection […] and the announcement as well as compensation to service provider companies.

Collective Labour Agreement, Service provision, Switzerland (December 2011)

In Mauritius, precarious workers represent the majority of the victims of work accidents in the manufacturing sectors. In 2011, the CMCTEU secured an agreement with several employers stipulating that workers with 12 months or less of service should not be exposed to very hazardous work, unless trained by a competent person. In Niger, the SYSTEX union achieved through collective bargaining that SOMINA would provide precarious workers with personal protective equipment (PPE).

 

Protecting women precarious workers

Women workers are disproportionally affected by precarious work. Where employment rights are linked to length of service, precarious women workers may fail to qualify for maternity leave since they are likely to have shorter lengths of service. Sectoral agreements extended to temporary workers can enable women to access maternity leave rights.

In Senegal, SUTIDS has already achieved the regularisation of hundreds of precarious workers, the majority of them men. The union is now bargaining for the regularisation of women workers, facing the reluctance of the employers who argue that women will be too expensive because of maternity leave. SUTIDS is also fighting to obtain maternity leave for women temporary workers who have no access to this right.

The protection of women precarious workers from gender-based violence (GBV) at work can also be covered.

> Article 40. Protection of working women victims of gender-based violence (GBV).

1. The Worker victim of GBV who is obliged to leave the job in the town where she came to provide services, in order to make effective her protection and her right to comprehensive social assistance, shall be entitled to a preferential right to take another job in the same professional group or equivalent category, if the company has any vacancy in their workplaces.

In such case, the company is obliged to inform the worker of the existing vacancies at that time or that may occur in the future. Moving or changing workplace will have an initial duration of six months, during which the company is obliged to reserve the job that was previously occupied by the worker.

At the end of this period, the employee may choose to return to her previous post work or continue in the new one. In the latter case, it will terminate the said reserve requirement.

Fifth National Collective Bargaining Agreement for Temporary Agency Workers, Spain

 

The struggle continues

Collective bargaining plays a vital role in limiting precarious work and protecting precarious workers’ rights and working conditions. However, the victories gained by unions continue to be challenged by employers.

Once agreements have been negotiated, they are not always respected and unions must continue to actively enforce them:

In July 2013, NUPENG in Nigeria was forced to take strike action to enforce an agreement that had previously been reached to address casualization in the oil and gas sector (http://www.industriall-union.org/ nupeng-strike-demands-met).

Enforcement of clauses to monitor compliance by subcontractors is a particular challenge due to the number and dispersion of subcontractors.

When agreements close off access to precarious work in one area, employers find new ways to avoid secure employment:

In Thailand, once the trade union had managed to improve the conditions of fixed-term contract workers and regularise their situation, companies began to hire agency workers.

And when agreements come up for renegotiation, unions have to fight again to keep the gains they have already won:

In Colombia, Sintracarbon had to once again take strike action in 2013 to get Carbones del Cerrejon to accept the inclusion of an article on subcontractors, having already taken action in 2011 to secure the clause in the first place.

To be most effective, collective bargaining must be combined with other strategies to fight precarious work. This includes organizing precarious workers, building unity between precarious and other workers, raising awareness among workers and the general public of the dangers of precarious work, international action and, critically, pushing for legislation that puts effective controls on the use of precarious work by employers.

Towards Sustainable Industrial Policy

Preface

IndustriALL Global Union represents 50 million workers worldwide in extractive, manufacturing and processing industries. The future sustainability of these industries, and of the planet we live on, depends on governments making strategic choices. Trade unions have a crucial role to play in working with governments and business to ensure that union goals of job creation, recognition of human rights and protection of the environment are respected in the process.

This is why IndustriALL is embarking on an ambitious program of working with its affiliates to develop and implement sustainable industrial policy. The aim of this paper is to stimulate discussion on sustainability by providing background on some of the key issues that need to be considered. IndustriALL meetings at global, regional, industry and company level will provide opportunities for affiliates to come together to build a common understanding on priorities for each sector or region and how to address them.

Together we can make a difference.

Jyrki Raina

General Secretary

What is Sustainable Industrial Policy?

Sustainability is defined as meeting the needs of the present, without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. That implies a healthy environment, a healthy economy, and a healthy society, built on sound foundations and maintained through good global governance.

An industrial policy is a plan to encourage desired patterns of industrial development and growth. It should strategically target specific industries and sectors, as well as consider broader needs such as transportation and communications infrastructure, education and skills training, research, and energy. A sustainable industrial policy must create a healthy economy and quality employment (decent, secure work that pays a living wage) while minimizing negative environmental impact and advancing the interests of society as a whole.

Sustainable industrial policy is not about creating conditions for companies to thrive at the expense of workers, society and the environment. It’s about creating conditions under which companies can operate in order to make a sustainable contribution to society.

Why do we need it?

The triple crisis

Our current path is unsustainable. We are facing crises on three fronts: environmental, economic and social. Climate change is a real and serious threat. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that to maintain global average warming below 2°C above pre-industrial levels (an amount of warming that will nevertheless have serious consequences) very significant actions need to be taken by 2015-2018. If the world delays to 2020, maintaining the 2° limit will require technologies that have not yet been developed, or are not yet proven. The longer action is delayed, the more likely that social standards and human rights will be sacrificed in a last minute panic to save the planet.

The degradation of our planet’s natural systems continues with reckless speed. Businesses have few solutions to offer. Too frequently, private interests actively try to prevent solutions from being found or implemented.

Global corporations act to maximize private control over resources, production, consumption and investment, while spreading the costs and risks of their activities over the rest of society. Their focus is on maximizing short-term profit, in full knowledge that this is unsustainable.

In the drive to generate ever-greater short-term profits, it has become more profitable to manipulate financial instruments than to actually make anything. Private equity buyouts promise phenomenal returns to investors by maximising the short-term extraction of cash from companies and loading them with debt at the expense of long-term productive investment, jobs and employment security.

The economic crisis resulted from policies that fuelled unbridled financial speculation and short-term profits at the expense of productive investment in the real economy. In countries most affected by the crisis, workers paid the price in massive job losses and rising unemployment. Citizens paid the price when taxpayers’ money was used to bail out the banks whose activities precipitated the crisis, and continue to pay as governments use the deficits caused by the bailouts to justify austerity measures.

The twin crises of the environment and the economy have created a third: a social crisis. Increasing disparities in wealth and income, reduced access to education, degraded population health (including occupational health) and attacks on health care, an explosion in precarious work, and vanishing opportunities, particularly for young people and traditionally disadvantaged groups, are all consequences of the failure to build a sustainable society.

Race to the bottom

Capital is no longer restricted to operating within national boundaries. Companies of all sizes and industries are inter-connected through global networks known as global value chains (GVCs). Multinational corporations (MNCs) have driven the development of GVCs by outsourcing parts or all of the production process.

Countries compete to be part of GVCs, often through narrow specialisation in labour-intensive, low skilled stages of production. Far from developing sustainable industrial policies, many governments rely on Export Processing Zones to attract foreign investment. Tax breaks and other incentives allow the wealth generated by production and labour to go directly into the coffers of the MNCs at the top of the chains, rather than into the hands of workers, or to contribute to the development of local industry.

The result is a global competition to drive down wages. Suppliers further down the chain are dependent on the price buyers above them are prepared to pay, negatively impacting the capacity of the parties to negotiate on wages and working hours and creating health and safety risks. Governments are allowing MNCs to dictate the conditions under which workers labour in their countries by demanding prices which do not reflect the true cost of labour, but which they are able to impose because of their dominant position in the chain.

We are witnessing the breaking down of the historical link between wages and productivity through, among other factors, the decline of collective bargaining as a mechanism to fairly distribute profits and the gains from productivity improvements. In their drive to maximise short-term profits, corporations seek productivity improvements via the low road of intensification of work, rather than through innovation. The enormous and unnecessarily complicated value chains of today’s MNCs have eroded respect for human rights. The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights make it clear that corporations have responsibility for what happens in their value chains, but the size and complexity of the chains make it impossible for MNCs to know what is really going on within them.

What does it look like?

Promoting equity

Social sustainability begins with respect for fairness, equity, justice, human rights, and human cultures and communities. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the labour standards of the International Labour Organization articulate many of these values.

Sustainability must address inequality, not by competing on the lowest wages, but by promoting collective bargaining to ensure that productivity improvements benefit those that contribute to them, thus raising wages and in turn contributing to industrial and social stability, reducing inequality and driving demand for the products of industrial production.

Crucially, sustainable industrial policy involves the development of effective industrial relations to mediate between the competing interests of workers and capital.

Harnessing technology

Sustainable industrial policy involves developing strategies to encourage greener technologies that address problems like climate change, while creating large numbers of decent jobs. Technological development should benefit workers and make their jobs easier, leading to increased productivity. It should not be used to reduce work to limited, repetitive tasks which make work unfulfilling, de-skill workers and cause illnesses and injuries, nor to cut jobs.

Advancing labour standards

A sustainable industrial policy includes the effective implementation of labour standards. This includes promotion of collective bargaining, resources for labour inspection, promotion of dialogue between industry and trade unions and labour laws, which restrict precarious work. All international bodies concerned with development need to promote freedom of association and collective bargaining as enabling rights, to make sure that the gains are passed onto workers.

Moreover, a sustainable industrial policy must be underpinned by social protection policies addressing unemployment, retirement and health care, to which industry must be required to contribute.

Building sustainable industry in a globalised world

Participation in global value chains must be about employment and quality of employment, not just driving increased profits for MNCs. Governments need to create industrial policies which lead to a more equitable distribution of the benefits of participation in GVCs towards workers and society and reinvestment in research and development and skills. We need integrated industrial development strategies, linked to the sustainable development of local industries as opposed to the enclave approach of EPZs.

Government policies should aim at encouraging higher level participation in value chains to capture more of the value added, thus strengthening the position of local companies and leading to increased wages, better working conditions and higher skill levels. But these benefits do not flow automatically. Collective bargaining must be promoted as the means to ensuring that workers also benefit from a higher level of participation in GVCs.

Just Transition

Knowing that our present-day systems are failing, the labour movement seeks to create a better, fairer society. There will necessarily be a transition period in getting to where we want to be, from where we are now. It is not sufficient that many new, greener, jobs will be created during that transition. The transition must consider the needs of present-day workers in present-day industries, as well as the potential to create newer, greener jobs in our journey to a sustainable future. This is a “Just Transition”: a complete package of sustainable industrial policies and social programs that will allow workers to benefit from change, rather than bear its costs.

How can it be implemented?

Strengthening the role of government

The free market cannot create sustainable development. There is no automatic link between economic growth and improved living standards. Per capita GDP can increase, while inequality worsens, and the environment is degraded. Government intervention is needed to rebalance the distribution of the benefits of economic activity.

As the only institutions that can stand against corporate greed, governments must create public policy that is genuinely in the public interest; backed by a strong and enforceable legislative and regulatory framework.

But the rise of free-market ideology has seen the decline of industrial policy-making by governments. State intervention to shape the direction of industrial development is challenged as protectionism and an illegitimate constraint on capital. Trade rules and agreements restrict government capacity to legislate environmental and social protections in the interests of their own citizens. Investor-state dispute settlement provisions in international trade agreements allow corporations to sue governments when legislation conflicts with their investment goals.

There needs to be a rebalancing of the power to dictate the terms of industrial development, away from MNCs and back to democratically-elected governments. Industrial policy needs to be revived, in order to correct for market failures through state intervention.

Inclusive policies

Sustainable industrial policy development requires an integrated approach which ensures policy coherence between the different arms of government, including departments of labour, the environment, industry, trade, research and energy. Similarly there must be policy coherence between and within the global institutions – the WTO, IMF, World Bank, ILO, UN, OECD – so that governments do not receive conflicting messages, particularly on labour market deregulation.

Unions must be part of industrial policy formulation and have an equal seat at the table with industry. The transformation of industry cannot happen without the active participation of workers.

Establish targets

Sustainable industrial policy needs targets in areas such as employment, R&D, energy efficiency, carbon emissions, reducing inequality, observance of labour standards, active labour market policies focussed on employment creation, retraining and re-employment of redundant workers, youth skills development. It should be guided by the development of both qualitative and quantitative indicators which are measured and analysed with the involvement of the social partners: business and trade unions.

Who is going to pay for it?

Financing for sustainable industrial policy

Global corporate profits have reached unprecedented levels. Shareholder dividends have increased at the expense of investment, jobs and social protection. Instead of profits being reinvested in R&D and innovation, they are directed towards speculation and rent-seeking. Shareholders are privileged through financialisation of corporate investment to deliver maximum short term financial returns.

Government action is needed to drive companies towards re-investing in development. Equally, companies need to be protected from destructive private equity buyouts. Governments must (re-) establish a regulatory environment which promotes productive investment. Legislative changes that have opened the doors to private equity buy-outs must be reversed. Preference should be given to investment in venture capital funds which focus on longer-term development and can thus contribute to job creation. External costs should be internalised so that companies are liable for the true costs of their business, not society. Governments should steer behaviour towards sustainable practices, for example through the creation of incentives and public procurement.

Thanks to corporate exploitation of tax loopholes and tax havens, governments are missing out on enormous amounts of tax revenue which could otherwise be used to support local industrial development and the public infrastructure that it needs. Regulation is needed to close the loopholes as well as action by global institutions to chase down missing tax revenue.

The financial sector must be put to the service of the real economy. Sustainable industrial policy needs to improve access to private sector financing for the transition to sustainable production as part of the reregulation of the financial sector.

The introduction of a Financial Transactions Tax would have the benefits of restraining the excesses of the financial sector, helping to stabilize currencies and raising a great deal of money that could be used to address climate change and other global issues.

What can IndustriALL do?

IndustriALL, representing 50 million workers in both energy producing and energy consuming industries, has a critical role to play in calling for sustainable industrial policy. The industries where IndustriALL’s members work create value through the transformation of extracted natural resources into products, through manufacturing and processing. How this is done can have significant positive or negative impacts on sustainability.

Every industrial sector and every region has its own particular challenges and concerns, with considerable variation between and within them. Sustainability can only be achieved when each of those challenges and concerns is dealt with in a consensus-seeking, integrative fashion that attempts to balance the environmental, economic and social imperatives of sustainability.

The IndustriALL Action Plan calls for strong industrial policies that recognise manufacturing as a key engine of growth for national economies. Yet well-paid, secure industrial jobs, which have traditionally been drivers of social progress, are in decline, thanks in part to global competition to drive down wages and the spread of precarious forms of employment. Many countries still have no industrial policy to speak of, let alone one that incorporates sustainability.

IndustriALL has a responsibility, reflected in its Action Plan, to:

The way forward

Significant work has already done by IndustriALL’s founding organizations, which each have a long tradition of work on sustainable development. This earlier work created the space for IndustriALL’s affiliated trade unions to speak up for a fair, ambitious and legally-binding global agreement on greenhouse gases.

Now there is a real – and urgent – need for IndustriALL to look at resource extraction, processing, manufacturing and energy through the lens of sustainability to develop a coherent and sustainable industrial policy at the international level, and to assist its affiliates in their work at the national and regional levels.

To this end, IndustriALL is developing a framework for sustainable industrial policy to be endorsed by affiliates and widely promoted as a basis for influencing governments, the global institutions and MNCs. This will involve building on our alliances with other labour organizations and with broader social movements.

All affiliates are encouraged to get involved in shaping IndustriALL’s approach to sustainable industrial policy, to maximise the impact we can make towards reorientating the global economy towards a sustainable future.

Asbestos is a killer

It’s still around. Roofs, walls, cars’ brake linings, floor tiles, kitchen stoves or industrial furnaces may still contain asbestos.

Asbestos remains a popular material in the developing world.

ASBESTOS IS A KILLER

And no one knows that better than trade unions.

We have become – and not by choice – authorities on asbestos and the havoc it has created in workplaces and among families.

The sad reality is that our files are replete with the tragic stories of members and their families who have suffered horrific illness and death as a result of workplace exposure to asbestos.

It was largely due to the efforts of unions representing those who suffered that regulations controlling the use of and exposure to asbestos were finally enacted in many countries.

Unfortunately, a global ban on asbestos has yet to be achieved. Asbestos is still around and there are those who continue to tout it as the “magic mineral.” In developing countries, it continues to be popular to make many products, most notably fibre-reinforced cement sheeting. In all countries, asbestos exposure continues to be a danger because of its long history of use: not only cement products but in hundreds of other uses such as brake linings, floor tiles, insulation and fireproofing. Weak regulation and enforcement allows people to continue to be fatally exposed to the killer fibres.

There are many lessons to be learned by union activists from the decades of battle waged to protect ourselves and the public from asbestos hazards:

If you think there is asbestos in your workplace:

Demand an immediate workplace asbestos survey. Your Joint Health and Safety Committee (JHSC) should lead the effort to identify and map all occurrences of asbestos and should be given all resources required to do the job.

Once the asbestos has been identified, the JHSC should develop recommendations to control exposure. There are four generally accepted approaches. In order of preference, they are:

  1. REMOVAL OF THE ASBESTOS MATERIAL In all cases, this is the recommended solution. It is the only way to ensure that the hazard is eliminated. Strict procedures for removal must be followed and enforced to prevent additional exposure. This calls for careful planning and attention to the training of all workers and supervisors as well as to the choice of replacement materials.
  2. ENCAPSULATION OR SEALING OF THE ASBESTOS MATERIAL Coating or impregnating the asbestos material with a bonding agent immobilizes the fibres and reduces their release. Danger still exists, however, because the bonding material will deteriorate with time, and work (cutting, grinding, repairs, etc.) may be performed on the material, creating the potential of fibres being released. Encapsulation should be considered a temporary measure with the objective of removing the asbestos material at some appropriate future date.
  3. ENCLOSURE OF THE ASBESTOS MATERIAL If neither removal nor encapsulation is possible within a reasonable time, the next best approach is to separate the asbestos material from the rest of the workplace by some kind of fixed barrier (removable ceilings or walls are not acceptable). Enclosure is not a control measure and should be accepted only as a temporary means of protecting workers until removal can be completed.
  4. ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT PLAN If materials cannot immediately be removed completely and safely, a management plan is required. If any asbestos materials remain in the workplace, even if encapsulated or enclosed, an ongoing system is needed to:

There will be a day of reckoning for them. I don’t know when it is but I hope it’s as hard and hurts as much as it does for me…

            – Blayne Kinart

I last saw Blayne Kinart alive around 2000. He was then a strong and fit-looking 54-year old. He had been  a chemical worker, an industrial millwright and a union activist. I had known him for several years as we both worked in Sarnia’s chemical valley and were involved with the (then) Energy and Chemical Workers’ Union (ECWU), which later merged into the CEP, which in turn became Unifor.

It was in 2002 that Blayne was diagnosed with mesothelioma. He died painfully on 6 July, 2004.

Blayne had worked for Welland Chemical, a producer of anhydrous aluminum chloride and sodium hypochlorite on land near Sarnia, Canada. The plant site was entirely surrounded by the lands of the Aamjiwnaang First Nation. Aluminum chloride was produced there by the direct reaction of molten aluminum with chlorine gas, for use mainly as a catalyst in other petrochemical processes. Welland, associated with the W.R. Grace and Company, abandoned operations in Sarnia in 1998 during a labour dispute that dragged on for over four years. The site was seized by the city of Sarnia for unpaid taxes.

Although many toxic effects can be attributed to the products and by-products of Welland Chemical, it was the asbestos insulation used on and around the aluminum furnace and process equipment that killed Blayne. We know this because mesothelioma, a cancer of the linings of the lungs, is a very specific form of cancer that is only known to be caused by asbestos.

As his body wasted away and death approached, Blayne allowed himself to be photographed so that the world could see what asbestos had done to him.

Brian Kohler

What is Asbestos?

Asbestos is a class of silicate mineral fibre. There are three main asbestos minerals: chrysotile, crocidolite, and amosite. These are sometimes referred to as white, blue, and grey or brown asbestos, respectively.

The most common type used today is chrysotile. Formerly, crocidolite was also widely used. Amosite was used less commonly and occurs today mainly in old products and materials. Other varieties of asbestos exist that were not generally used in industry but may exist as contaminants in some products; an example of this is tremolite which may contaminate vermiculite and talcum powder.

Because of their chemical structure, they form long crystalline fibres of amazing strength and fire resistance which can be recovered from the mineral.

Most commonly, asbestos is used in textiles, cement products, brake linings, filters, roofing tiles, flooring, fillers for plastics and thousands of other products.

A watch list of asbestos related issues

There are a multitude of environmental and health related issues surrounding the use of asbestos in society.

Despite advances in health and safety standards on many fronts, asbestos is still in use. The first published article linking asbestos to disease came out in about 1906. No other cause of occupational disease has been as extensively studied, yet the industry remains. The art of denying scientific evidence and creating doubt in the public mind was perfected by the asbestos industry; and the tactics have been used by other industries wishing to avoid liability for their actions or products.

It is useful for health and safety activists to keep alert on the dangers inherent with the use of asbestos and to keep the focus where it should be: saving our members’ livelihoods and lives.

With that in mind, here is an overview of the issues at stake today:

EXPOSURE LIMITS Even though there is no evidence that there is any safe level of exposure, most jurisdictions have enacted limits. Check with the authorities in your jurisdiction on what applies in your workplace. When working with or near asbestos, workers need to assure themselves that exposure limits are not being exceeded; that protective measures are adequate (respirators, clothing, etc.); and, that you are not endangering yourself. Unions have made the right to refuse unsafe work one of the fundamental health and safety demands.

SMOKING AND ASBESTOS An asbestos workers who smokes will have many times the risk of cancer than a non-smoking asbestos worker or a non-asbestos exposed smoker would have. But attempts to deflect the dangers of asbestos by blaming high cancer rates on smoking are irresponsible. The fact is that asbestos workers who have never smoked in their lives can also die of asbestos related cancers.

BLUE vs WHITE There has been some suggestion that only blue (crocidolite) asbestos is a problem and that white (chrysotile) asbestos is relatively safe. If true, why is asbestos related disease so widespread when crocidolite accounts for only 3 per cent of all asbestos used? In fact, the difference in working conditions for miners in countries where crocidolite was mined, probably accounts for the different mortality rates observed.

IMMOBILIZED FIBRES Particularly for asbestos-cement products, industry makes the argument that the fibres are immobilized or bound together in such a way that they cannot be released. But, there are workers who must handle these fibres prior to their incorporation into such products and others who must saw, cut or fasten them in such a way that the fibres may be released.

FIBRE MODIFICATION There is no evidence that chemically modifying asbestos fibres renders them safer, and the only way to find out we are wrong is to wait decades for workers to die or get sick.

SUBSTITUTE PRODUCTS Fibreglass and other synthetic mineral fibres are the main asbestos substitutes for insulation and fireproofing. While it may be true that they are safer to work with than asbestos, the best approach for workers is to treat asbestos substitutes with suspicion and handle them with caution. The more similar the substitute is to asbestos, the more likely it is to have similar health effects. Cellulose fibres have been found to be an effective and safer susbstitute for asbestos in cement products.

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Asbestos provides a good example of the linkage between occupational and environmental health and safety. Widespread environmental contamination with asbestos in asbestos producing region and near industries which use asbestos may be causing a “cancer epidemic in slow motion.”

JUST TRANSITION Regrettably, the money already spent by governments propping up this sunset industry could have been used to create a first class Just Transition programme for asbestos workers, their families and the communities that have depended on the asbestos industry. Instead, producer countries have chosen to remain the last defenders of the indefensible.

HOW ASBESTOS KILLS

Asbestosis is one disease caused by asbestos in the lungs.

Some scientists think that when asbestos fibres are inhaled, cells called macrophages attempt to engulf and digest them. The fibres are not easily dissolved by the digestive enzymes, however – although certain harmful chemical constituents of asbestos may be dissolved enough to be a problem in themselves.

As well, the size and shape of asbestos fibres causes some of them to project through the cell wall of the macrophages, allowing these powerful enzymes to leak out and attack surrounding lung tissue.

The end result is progressive scarring and damage to the lungs, resulting in loss of elasticity of the lung tissue.

Damage can become severe enough to cause disability and death.

Cancer is another consequence of asbestos exposure. Estimates of the number of cancer cases vary widely but one estimate is that up to 5 per cent of all cancer deaths in in any given year could be attributable to asbestos.

Of the cancers that asbestos is known to cause, 80 per cent are lung cancers; 10 per cent are mesotheliomas; and 10 per cent are others such as throat, stomach and intestinal.

Although some asbestos cancers are difficult or impossible to distinguish from cancers caused by other agents; mesothelioma ( cancer of the lining of the lungs or intenstines) is ONLY known to be caused in humans by asbestos. Mesothelioma is 100 per cent fatal.

Don’t take your rights to the grave

Most jurisdictions have regulations governing asbestos removal. In general, they describe how to:

  1. Prepare the work and isolate the area where removal will take place
  2. Protect the workers
  3. Minimize the accidental release of asbestos
  4. Decontaminate the area and complete the work

If there is any doubt about whether the work is proceeding safely or not, remember that the regulations are a minimum standard. Compliance with regulations may not be sufficient in some cases.

Remember that in many jurisdictions, by law or by collective agreement, workers have the right (and in some cases the duty) to refuse unsafe work. If this applies to you, and you believe that the work puts you or fellow workers at risk – don’t do it. Don’t take your rights to the grave!

Peaceful Indonesian packaging workers smashed by police

The workers were calling for PT Indofood CKA to pay the new minimum wage level passed by the local Purwakarta government in December 2013, an increase of US$39 per month.

Other confrontations and intimidation had occurred throughout June, but on 2 July the level of brutality was dramatically stepped up. The attached photos illustrate the serious injuries sustained by 20 workers from indiscriminate kicking, hitting, stone throwing, and the firing of tear gas canisters directly at them. Police also damaged and stole parts of the workers’ motorbikes that they use to get to work, and arrested six workers.

IndustriALL’s proud Indonesian trade union affiliate FSPMI is calling for protest letters to be sent to the heads of the Indonesian government and police. 539 of the total 890 PT Indofood CKA workforce are FSPMI members. Use the attached solidarity machine to write to those figures. Condemn the police brutality, demand the release of the six detained workers, demand worker compensation for their damaged motorbikes, and an end to the violence.

IndustriALL general secretary Jyrki Raina wrote to the Indonesian authorities:

This treatment of workers exercising their inalienable right to organize and bargain collectively shows the worse possible image of Indonesia to the world. You must use your influence to rectify this unacceptable situation and heal the wounds made by your police’s violence.

PT Indofood CBP Makmur Tbk, located in the capital Jakarta, produces numerous popular, market leading food products in Indonesia. The packaging workers’ plant is one of four large facilities in South-Central Jakarta, owned by Indonesian state fugitive Liem Swie Liong.

Regardless of the excellent profitability of the company, FSMPI members were forced to strike from 11 March following four months of management refusing to discuss increasing their poverty wages. Now the striking workers have been attacked by the Brimob Brigade that is normally reserved for terrorists.

In December 2013, the employer dismissed 450 workers requesting a change in their employment status from precarious contract to permanent workers.

UAW forms local union in VW Chattanooga plant vicinity

It is the first time that UAW has set up a local union branch specifically to represent workers in a single workplace.

UAW said the new Local 42, which is organized by Volkswagen employees, will give workers a voice at the plant through the German company’s works council approach to employee engagement.

Gary Casteel, UAW’s secretary-treasurer, said:

“We’ve had ongoing discussions with Volkswagen and have arrived at a consensus with the company. Upon Local 42 signing up a meaningful portion of Volkswagen’s Chattanooga workforce, we’re confident the company will recognize Local 42 by dealing with it as a members’ union that represents those employees who join the local. As part of this consensus, the UAW is committed to continuing its joint efforts with Volkswagen to ensure the company’s expansion and growth in Chattanooga.”

The Tennessee plant is the only Volkswagen manufacturing unit in the world which is not unionized.  

IndustriALL’s general secretary, Jyrki Raina, said:

We applaud the initiative from UAW to set up a local union branch as well as Volkswagen’s close cooperation with the union. It is high time for real freedom of association in the South of the United States, so that workers can freely join a union of their choice, without interference or intimidation.

In February 2014, UAW failed to gain the majority they needed to set up a works council within the Chattanooga plant by just 626 votes to 712. The election process was widely condemned for outside interference after an aggressive opposition campaign led by Republican politicians and anti-union groups, involving threats and intimidation.  

The State’s lawmakers threatened to withhold State economic incentives for the plant if it were unionized. Furthermore, in the lead up to the election Republican Senator Bob Corker wrongly claimed that Volkswagen would only produce a new SUV at the Chattanooga plant if the UAW failed to get union representation, which the car manufacturer vehemently denied.

UAW has now renewed requests for the State of Tennessee to extend the economic incentives so Volkswagen could add a new product line at the plant.

“State officials have assured the public and the Volkswagen workforce that the decision on incentives for Chattanooga is not related to whether workers exercise their right to join a union,” said Ray Curry, director of UAW Region 8.

The Local 42 is a big step forward in the efforts to organize more plants in the United States, particularly the South. IndustriALL is now working with affiliates to create local union branches for workers at other non-unionized companies in the country.

Inditex

The ground-breaking agreement between IndustriALL Global Union and Inditex, which was renewed in 2014, is the first of its kind to cover a retail supply chain.  

It underlines that freedom of association and the right to bargain collectively play a central role in a sustainable supply chain because they provide workers with the mechanisms to monitor and enforce their rights at work. 

Under the GFA, which was originally signed with IndustriALL's predecessor the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers' Federation in 2007, Inditex recognizes IndustriALL as its global trade union counterpart. Both parties undertake to collaborate to ensure the sustainable and long-term observance of all international labour standards across Inditex's operations, including its suppliers. 

Inditex’s Code of Conduct for External Manufacturers and Suppliers underpins the agreement which outlaws forced labour, child labour, discrimination and harsh and inhumane treatment throughout the Inditex supply chain. It provides for the payment of a living wage for a standard workweek, limitations on working hours, healthy and safe workplaces, regular employment and environmental awareness. The terms of the agreement apply equally to direct suppliers, contractors and sub-contractors including homeworkers. No subcontracting is allowed without the prior written consent of Inditex and suppliers allowed to subcontract will be responsible for subcontractor compliance.

Recognizing the role of organized labour and collective bargaining, Inditex and IndustriALL will keep constantly under review developments in this area in the Inditex supply chain and will co-operate in finding solutions where problems are detected, including collaborating on training programmes for management and workers.

To facilitate this ongoing review Inditex will provide IndustriALL with relevant information on its supply chain and both Inditex and IndustriALL will jointly develop training policies and programmes to drive compliance.

The application of the agreement will be reviewed annually by a six person group drawn jointly from Inditex and IndustriALL. 

Support for UNITE glass workers on strike in North East England

The 112 Unite members are at two sites, Kingsway and 7th Avenue on the Team Valley Industrial Estate in North East England. The company makes laminated and toughened glass for bus windows and windscreens, as well as bulletproof items.

Negotiations failed in talks through the UK conciliation service Acas on 26 June. Cost of living increases for the workers mean that workers need more than the “paltry” offer that the company is refusing to increase, or change the “strings attached” that make the offer self-funding for the workers.

The two-week strike action started on 30 June and will run until next Monday, 14 July. This follows a seven day strike from 16 June

Unite’s regional officer Bob Bolam stated:

Our members are taking strike action as a last resort over this paltry offer. They believe that this profitable company could well afford to be more generous… The Tyneside Safety Glass claim that it is cash-strapped has a very hollow ring as it had oodles of cash to give to one of its directors and also to generously top up the owner’s trust fund.

You can support the strikers by sending messages of solidarity to Unite regional officer Bob Bolam.